March 8: Int'l Womens' Day March & rally

Saturday March 8

Rally & March On International Women's Day!


12 Noon Rally - Union Square
(14th & Broadway)

1 pm - March
3:30 pm - Ending Ceremony memorializing the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire

March 5: MoveOn panel discussion on netroots

From MoveOn:

Dear MoveOn member,
We wanted to invite you to a panel discussion in New York City tomorrow [Wed] evening on "How the Netroots are Changing Progressive Politics." MoveOn is co-sponsoring this event, which will feature leading progressive thinkers, writers, bloggers, and other activists.

Tomorrow—Wednesday, March 5, 6:30-8:00pm

CUNY Graduate Center, Proshansky Auditorium, 365 Fifth Avenue, between 34th and 35th Sts (one block from the Empire State Building)


The discussion will include analysis of how online organizing is making a difference on key issues such as foreign policy, economics, and constitutional rights. It also will include discussion of the progressive movement as distinct from the Democratic Party. There will be an active question-and-answer component where the audience can get involved.

Below are the details for the event—can you attend?

Panel discussion on "How the Netroots are Changing Progressive Politics" sponsored by The Nation and MoveOn.org Political Action

Panel participants will include
Katrina vanden Heuvel, Publisher and Editor of The Nation;
Zephyr Teachout, Assistant Professor of Law, Duke University and an architect of Howard Dean's Internet strategy;
Matt Stoller, a founding blogger of OpenLeft and President of BlogPAC;
Roberto Lovato, a writer at New America Media and blogger for Of América; and
Ari Melber, a correspondent for The Nation and a contributing editor at Personal Democracy Forum.

RSVP: If you're on Facebook, you can RSVP at this link (if not, feel free to just come and enjoy):


We hope you can make it for this interesting discussion. Thanks for all you do.
–Adam G., Nita, Justin, and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team
Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

March actions to protest U.S. occupation of Iraq

March 19, 2008 is the begining of the sixth year of the U.S. occupation of Iraq. In addition to a major action on March 19 in Washington, DC there are a number of events in New York that will commemorate this infamous anniversary. Here are some:

5 Years of Occupation and Counting: Public Forum

March 12, 2008 07:00-09:00PM

HUNTER COLLEGE,
THOMAS HUNTER BLDG, RM 105
68th St & Lexington Ave

Why the U.S. Isn't Leaving Iraq - Unless We Make Them

Many people on the left agree that the Iraq War is a mess, appears unwinnable for the U.S. – but unclear on how (or when) the war will end. Come to a public forum which will discuss, among other issues, the real impact of the war on ordinary Iraqis – as well as the crisis the U.S. is in - why they will not just abandon the disaster in progress being waged in the name of oil and strategic positioning.

Hosted by David Bliven



March 19:
KNIT-IN

MARCH 19, 2008 at NOON
In NYC: Times Square Recruiting Center, 43rd-44th Streets and Broadway
In WASHINGTON, DC: Veterans Affairs office, 810 Vermont Ave NW

The Granny Peace Brigade welcomes everyone, women and men of all ages to join them as knitters or supporters. As we enter the 6th year of the war on Iraq we will knit for our wounded veterans and their families, and for Iraqi children and their families. Every stitch will be a symbol of our determination to end this war, restoring our nation's priorities to constructive action, responsibility and caring for all.


Candlelight Vigil and Rally

March 19, 2008, 5:30-7:30PM

CHOOSE PEACE, END WAR

Candlelight Vigil and Rally
for 5th Anniversary of Iraq War

March 19, 5:30-7:30 pm in Koreatown
corner of 32nd St. and Broadway
in front of Woori Bank

March 19, 2008 marks the beginning of the 6th year of US war and occupation in Iraq. Bush says US troops are there for the long haul, based on the "South Korea model". As Koreans who believe in peace and justice, we say no more senseless destruction, no more racist war, and sovereignty for the Iraqi people.
Hosted by Nodutdol For Korean Community Development


March 21, 8:30-12:15PM

Good Friday Way of the Cross

Dag Hammarskjold Plaza,
47th St. bet. First and Second Aves.
From Dag Hammarskjold Plaza we proceed to 42nd Street and proceed along 42nd Street to bet. Eighth and Ninth Aves

This year Pax Christi Metro New York is dedicating its 26th annual Good Friday Way of the Cross to the tragedy of the fifth anniversary of the Iraq War. This Way of the Cross is a PRAYER PROCESSION in which we commemorate Jesus' passion and death and his continuing suffering in people today. It is exclusively PRAYER. People wear and/or carry crosses. No banners, posters, signs, or the like are allowed. All are welcome to join us in this Christian Stations of the Cross as a prayerful way to mourn the horrific loss of life and the destruction of nations due to war.

Hosted by Rosemarie Pace

March 22, 2008 12:00-02:15PM

River to River: Join Hands for Peace

accross 14th St.
(Directions: Subways: L,A,C,E,1,2,3,F,N,R,4,5,6)

Noon - We will form a human chain along 14th St in Manhattan between Avenue A and 11th Avenue. Take any subway to 14th St. and you will be directed from there. Bring your signs as we make a strong statement for peace!
1:00 - Both ends of the line (from 11th Ave and Ave. A) will march in towards the center.
2:00 - Commemoration. We will hold flowers and photos of U.S. servicepeople, Iraqis, New Orleans, wounded vets, etc. - the casualties of the War on Iraq. The tolling of the bells will signal the time for 5 minutes of silence and we will end with Taps.

Stay tuned to www.unitedforpeace.org/nyc for maps, leaflets to download, specific meet-up locations of organizations.

Hosted by Leslie Kielson

Max Attendees: 10000 (Currently 33 Registered)

In Brooklyn:

Brooklyn Says No To War

March 19, 2008 6:00-7:00PM

Grand Army Plaza
Flatbush and Eastern Parkway


Brooklyn Says No to War with a march from Grand Army Plaza on Flatbush to the U.S. Military recruiting center, 41 Flatbush (Livingston) 1.2 miles. Meet at Grand Army Plaza at 6pm on March 19. Bring signs and banners. 5 Years of War in Iraq, 5 years too many.

Hosted by Diane Lent

Why does Obama have to keep affirming his Christianity?

Granted truth should trump right-wing rumors about political candidates.
But does it bother anyone but me that Obama has to keep denying that he is a Muslim and keep reaffirming his Christianity?
Why should anyone care which god he worships?
Americans need to grow up.
Can you say, national chauvinism? Can you say racism?

Thursday, February 28th @ 7PM - $10 to 20 Suggested

Remembering Spirit, Remembering Audre Lorde
A Benefit For The Audre Lorde Project
Come out and honor the life and work of Audre Lorde in a reading of her poetry,
essays and memoirs as we celebrate her birthday. Hear from Andrew Blint,
Holiday Simmons, Victor Tobar and other writers and artists as they share
pieces of her legacy.


BLUESTOCKINGS
172 Allen Street @ Stanton
(1 block south of Houston)
www.bluestockings.com
phone: 212-777-6028

Pre Oscar nods

The day before the Oscars yields several awards. Film Independent presented its most coveted awards to Juno for Best Feature and its star Ellen Page for Best Female Lead and its screenwriter Diablo Cody for Best First screenplay. Best Male Lead went to Philip Seymour Hoffman for The Savages, which also won the Best Screenplay for Tamara Jenkins. The Best Director Award went to Julian Schnabel for The Diving Bell and the Butterfly , which also won the Best Cinematographer Award for Janusz Kaminski, The two supporting acting awards went to Best Supporting Male Chiwetel Ejiofor for Talk To Me and Cate Blanchett for Best Supporting Female in I'm Not There, clearly the most unusual film of the year as attested to by the Robert Altman Award to the following: Director: Todd Haynes; Casting: Laura Rosenthal and Ensemble Cast: Cate Blanchett, Christian Bale, Richard Gere, Heath Ledger, Ben Whishaw, Bruce Greenwood, Marcus Carl Franklin, Charlotte Gainsbourg, David Cross, Julianne Moore, Michelle Williams. The Best first feature went to Director Scott Frank for The Lookout . For further information on Film Independent and this year's spiritawards

If all that's not enough at the annual Razzie Awards, honoring the worst in film, Lindsey Lohan took home record honors for her work in the horror-suspense movie, I Know Who Killed Me.

The movie beat out the previous Razzie record-holder, Showgirls by rounding up eight awards including worst actress and worst screen couple for Lohan (she plays two people) and worst picture.

But Lohan wasn't alone: Eddie Murphy was a close second, nabbing this year's worst actor and worst supporting actor. His comedy Norbit snagged three Razzies, while Daddy Day Camp, starring Cuba Gooding Jr. took home an award, too, for worst prequel or sequel.

Demand NO TORTURE

Here's Harry Reid's response to my petition demanding the U.S. end torture. But we have to keep the pressure on Congress.

Dear Daniel,

Since Tuesday, tens of thousands of you stepped forward and took a stand against torture. I am happy to announce that all your hard work paid off. Thank you.

The Senate passed the Intelligence Authorization bill banning torture. This sent a clear signal to the world: the United States Senate believes torture is immoral and does not work.

Now the bill will go to George Bush, who has a choice: He can sign it into law and declare America does not torture. Or he can continue to damage America's reputation in the world.

Now is the moment when we all need to join together and say "no" to torture. If you've already signed the petition, please forward this e-mail to your friends and family and ask them to sign. If you haven't signed, take a stand against torture now by visiting:

http://giveemhellharry.com/stoptorture

Nearly every expert on interrogation agrees that torture is counter-productive. Most of the information it generates is simply unreliable, causing our intelligence agencies to waste time chasing down false leads. It also puts U.S. troops at risk, in addition to undermining our counterinsurgency operations.

Now is the time for George Bush to show some moral leadership and sign this bill into law. That is why, right now, all of us need to join together and take a stand against torture by visiting:

http://giveemhellharry.com/stoptorture
Thank you,

Harry Reid

Please sign superdelegates petition

Hi,

You've probably heard about the "superdelegates" who could end up choosing the Democratic nominee.

The superdelegates are under lots of pressure right now to come out for one candidate or the other. We urgently need to encourage them to let the voters decide between Clinton and Obama—and then to support the will of the people.

Why did the party adopt this undemocratic system?

Super-delegates were created to provide the powers that be control over the nominating process.

Before 1972, party elders, such as Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and Bronx boss Charlie Buckley, who helped John Kennedy clinch the 1960 nomination, wielded inordinate power.

But in early 1970’s, in response to the demands of grass-roots activists, women, and people of color, the party’s rules were reformed to make them more democratic.

But after Sen. George McGovern, a leading anti-Vietnam war liberal, won the 1972 nomination and then won only one state and the District of Columbia in the general election. The Democrats decided to give elected officials and other party regulars greater last-minute control over the nomination. This is much like the undemocratic electoral college, which was put in place because many of the "founding fathers" didn't trust the will of the masses.

I signed a MoveOn petition urging the superdelegates to respect the will of the voters. Can you join me at this link?

Congressional races also count

As the corporate-owned media almost exclusively cover the presidential primaries, Americans are voting to enhance their 2006 vote to put Democrats in charge of Congress. Only Amy Goodman is covering the Congressional races on Democracy Now. Despite the (or maybe because of the) Democrats latest collaboration with the Bush regime, Democrats are voting for congress members who will actually vote to reject the Bush regime immoral and illegal moves.

In [Maryland's] Fourth Congressional District, Democratic activist Donna Edwards defeated eight-term incumbent Albert Wynn in a fiercely contested race.

The race has been described by The Nation magazine as “a bellwether contest in the fight for the soul of the Democratic Party.” Edwards ran a populist, antiwar campaign that drew support from national liberal groups.

Feb. 15: Film Showing: All Power to the People: The Black Panther Party and Beyond

New York City Film Showing:

All Power to the People! The Black Panther Party and Beyond

Feb 15, 7pm
2295 Adam Clayton Powell (at 135th St.)
2/3 or C/B to 135th street
$7 donation suggested.

Opening with a montage of 400 years of race injustice in America, this powerful documentary provides the historical context for the establishment of the 60's civil rights movement. Rare clips of Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Fred Hampton and other activists transport one back to those revolutionary times. Organized by Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton, the Black Panther Party embodied every major element of the civil rights movement, which preceded it and inspired the black, brown, yellow, Native American and women and gay and lesbian power movements.



Get involved! Contact 212-694-8720 or nyc@ANSWERCoalition.org


A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition
info@internationalanswer.org
National Office in Washington DC: 202-544-3389
New York City: 212-694-8720
Los Angeles: 323-464-1636
San Francisco: 415-821-6545
Chicago: 773-463-0311
Seattle: 206-568-1661

Sen. Clinton abandons older Americans

I have just sent the following e-mail to Sen. Clinton criticizing her non-vote on the amendment last week to expand the economic stimulus package to include older Americans whose primary income is from social security.

I'm sorry that you didn't think it was important enough to vote Yes on the amendment to include older Americans in the economic stimulus package. This will help provide economic relief to approximately 20 million older Americans who depend primarily on Social Security, as well as fairly and effectively boost our troubled economy.

It is too bad you didn't listen to the American public who have been urging Senators to push through partisan gridlock to address national problems. Our country needs the leadership of elected officials to address the economic concerns of all Americans. I'm sorry you chose not to provide swuch leadership. If running for president precludes you from doing your job in the Senate, you should resign and allow someone for whom it is their primary concern and can provide us with a full-time Senator.

It's The L Word, stupid!

The two new Sex and the City (SATC) pretenders, Cashmire Mafia and Lipstick Jungle have provoked Entertainment Weekly's "The Search for the Next Sex and the City." The article by Jennifer Armstrong talks about every conceivable buddy show from the two new mediocre shows to Black female buddies (Girlfriends), white male buddies (Entourage and Carpoolers) and other white female shows like Desperate Houswives and shows that include women of color (Grey's Anatomy); but she (and her editors) ignore the most obvious heir to SATC, The L Word. I can't help but wonder why. Armstrong even quotes writer-producer Jenny Bicks' comment: "The question is, who is the next group who hasn't had a voice yet?" And never even seems to consider the obvious answer.

MSNBC's Davd Shuster raises a firestorm

Last Thursday MSNBC's regular news comentator David Shuster started a mini-firestorm when as subtitute host on Tucker he asked

"Doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being pimped out [by the Clinton campaign] in some weird sort of way?"

I think it's clear that, the New York Post and the Clinton campaign notwithstanding, this wasn't "nappy-headed hos" redux. But it was obviously an incredibly stupid comment. It's hard to understand why anyone would question an adult daughter campaigning for her mother, especially in terms as insulting to everyone concerned. (The women on The View also found humor in phone calls Chelsea made to them.) It's important to note that Shuster apologized for his stupid language and he was almost immediately indefinitly suspended by MSNBC, but for how long.

This was an opportunity for Hillary Clinton and her campaign to take the high road, to show everyone how diplomatic she could be and say something like "He apologized, he's been suspended, let's get back to the real issues." But not surprisingly she played the sympathy and angry mother card. Her spokesperson Howard Wolfson said:

I, at this point, can't envision a scenario where we could continue to engage in debates on that network, given the comments that were made.

Come on Howard I'll bet you could envision such a scenario.

It's also not surprising that the New York Post would be stoking the fires of this controversy. They are, after all, intimately related to MSNBC's primary competitor the Fox News Channel, a fact the Post failed to mention in its front-page headlined story: "Chelsea 'pimp' Fury; Hill rips MSNBC on campaign slur." It's clearly in Fox's interest to screw up the MSNBC debate, since they are trying to schedule one of their own, to which Clinton has agreed despite a Democratic candidates agreement not to do so.

A pro-choice Clinton supporter, according to the Post, wrote to MSNBC to say:

Your tolerance for [Shuster's] behavior speaks volumes about the corporate culture of MSNBC.

As someone who watches MSNBC with some regularity this question has bothered me as well. MSNBC's staffing decisions should raise red flags. After Morning Joe, with Joe Scarborough, about 11AM, the news anchors are all attractive young mostly white women. Unless something important happens (like Romney ending his campaign) then the MSNBC male contingent takes over. But daily at 5PM promptly Chris Matthews comes on and then it's wall-to-wall men (mostly white) until 10PM, when some sleazy "documentaries" come on. Not only the anchors but also most of the pundits on MSNBC are white men (except for Air America's Rachel Maddow, the Washington Post's Eugene Robinson, a scattering of NBC female correspondents and Allison Stewart who sometimes substitutes for Keith
Olbermann). This, it seems to me, "speaks volumes about the corporate culture at MSNBC."

Shuster's unquestionably stupid and sexist comment may well end up being a tempest in a teapot, but it raises some important questions about how MSNBC, the Murdoch media, and the Clinton campaign operate. And they all leave something to be desired.

Quote of the day: The Vice-presidential Dick

The wisdom of Dick Cheney: .(At the CPAC convention to thunderous applause)

The United States is a country that takes human rights seriously… We do not torture, America is a fair and a decent country… The war on terror is, after all, more than a war of arms and a test of will. It is a war of ideals,

It's very simple, if you're in Dick Cheney's head, the U.S. doesn't torture, so whatever we do must, by definition, not be torture.

Sign letter to candidates: change course!

I just signed an important global letter to the U.S. Presidential candidates. The outcome of the next U.S. election will greatly affect the world and I thought you might want to sign this letter too. Here’s the link:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/us_change_course/98.php?CLICK_TF_TRACK
Yesterday, the candidates for the next President became clear. They are Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain. The winner will decide whether the nightmare of the Bush foreign policy is reversed or continued for another four years.

All around the world, including in the U.S., people want to see the next President change course. Although only U.S. citizens can vote in the election, we can still have a voice. Global public opinion matters to U.S. citizens -- they know that U.S. respect in the world has plummeted under Bush. That’s why the Avaaz global community has sprung into action. In the next few days, we can influence the candidates as they develop their campaign strategy. Click below to read and endorse the letter to the candidates. And, if we get more than 100,000 signatures, Avaaz will publish it in U.S. newspapers and deliver it personally to the Clinton, Obama and McCain campaigns--sign and forward this email to friends right away:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/us_change_course/98.php?CLICK_TF_TRACK

I think this is a great idea on an important issue, and I hope you'll join me by signing up!

Thanks!

Super Tuesday. What Now?

Although I would much rather talk about Super Sunday, it seems clear that we have to shift our gaze to the aftermath of that other media-hyped super day: super Tuesday.

As we watch the Republican candidates (almost surely at this point John "I don't know much about the economy" McCain) move further and further to the right to please the Limbaugh wing of the party. Watch them cowtow to the Conservative Political Action Committee this weekend. I think McCain will probably pick extreme right-wing Huckelberry (as my friend Bert calls him) as his running mate. Although it's interesting to watch McCain hold a live press conference with right-wing independent(?) Joe Lieberman (possibly the perennial vice-presidential candidate) peering over his shoulder. Is Romney taking today off to talk to his family (about how much of their inheretance he should spend to tilt at windmills) a portent of dropping out? We now have to figure out how progressives (Democrat or independent) should relate to the two Democratic candidates left standing - Clinton and Obama.

The first thing we have to understand is that they are both politicians and therefore will do whatever they have to do to get elected. Try this on for size: Sam Stein reports on The Huffington Post:

Risking the ire of progressive activists, Sen. Hillary Clinton’s campaign announced that it has accepted a debate to air on Fox News on February 11, according to her chief strategist Mark Penn. (for more on this)

We have to make it clear that they have to attend to progressive issues if they want our votes. It seems to me that the big mistake progressives often make is to tie our movement to a particular candidate - in other words, to reify electoral politics at the expense of the progressive movemement, to commit ourselves without getting what we need for our support.

A very good friend and comrade has said in an e-mail he sent out explaining his decision to vote for Clinton, even at the expense of angering his Obama-supporting family: "I remain deeply skeptical about Obama and voted for Clinton," he writes. Although I share his skepticism about Obama's tendency to paper over deep and abiding divisions (class conflicts?) within this society. But I don't quite follow the conclusion that voting for Clinton better speaks to these differences. Is she more sensetive to these real differences than is Obama? I think not.

In the same e-mail he questions some progressives who are

very happy that Obama's campaign is bringing young people into electoral politics. I too applaud this altho I do not think that the core issues our society faces can be basically addressed in the electoral or legislative arena. I am only slightly overstating the case when I say that a pre-occupation with electoral politics can draw attention away from more substantive, core, socio-economic issues. I realize that there is some overlap between the two. Participation in electoral politics is by no means an error in and of itself.

The real question it seems to me is why should we applaud young people being brought into electoral politics as individuals rather than as part of a movement that can confront the candidates and say, "if you don't share our values, why should we vote for you?" Drawing young people into electoral politics is exactly what, I think, legitimates a Nader or other small party candidacy.

Tim Carpenter of Progressive Democrats of America put it this way this morning on Democracy Now:

the challenge for the progressive movement and the peace and justice movement is to come off the sidelines and continue in this effort to hold the Clinton machine back, to hold back this election to make sure that we get a full accounting of all of the primaries and caucuses, and to try to make Barack Obama a better candidate.

The key, I think, is that we need to do this as a movement not as a bunch of individuals relating to different candidates.

Tom Hayden says about the participation of the peace movement in the electoral process:

hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of voters will make up their minds on which of the candidates is best on ending the Iraq war with little involvement by peace activists in the debate.
There are differences that matter between Clinton and Obama, not as great as between the Democrats and McCain, but significant nonetheless. They are these:

1.Obama favors a 16-18 month timeline for withdrawing U.S. combat troops. Clinton favors “immediately” convening the Joint Chiefs to draft a plan to “begin” drawing down U.S. troops, but with no timetable for completing the withdrawal.
2.Obama opposed the measure authorizing Bush to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization, widely regarded as an escalating step towards another war. Clinton voted for the authorization.
3.Obama opposed the 2002 authorization for war that Clinton voted for. Clinton still calls that decision a “close call” and refuses to say it was a mistaken vote.

It’s true that both candidates support leaving thousands of 'residual' American troops behind for a likely counterinsurgency conflict that we should all oppose. Peace activists should demand a shift to peace diplomacy beginning with a U.S. commitment to end the occupation and withdraw all troops.

This is, of course, the point: do we applaude bringing people into electoral politics as individuals or as part of a larger and thereby stronger movement?

Bill Fletcher of The Black Commentator also said on this morning's Democracy Now:

while it’s true that many younger people have been inspired and motivated to the Obama campaign and have been prepared to put race aside in certain respects, we should keep in mind that the Obama campaign has not exactly made racial justice central programmatically to its campaign. So while people may have—or may be prepared to ignore the fact or accept the fact that Obama is black and they’re prepared to vote for him, that’s very different than having a discussion about race.

That's it for now. We could say much the same about the environmental movement, health care, the economy, but ultimately the question is about the dialectic between the progressive movement and the political process. If we jump on a bandwagon too soon we will have no effect on the outcome, but if we stay out of the process we will slso have no effect. You know, they say you gotta be in it to win it, but if you jump in too soon with too much, soon you'll be gambling away the rent.

Obama on Iraq

Whatever happens tonight, Obama keeps looking better. This is from Lev Weitz and Andrew Cohen-Gael:

holy shit check out this speech:

:

I don't oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

For more of this speech

Giants again

I don't mean to belabor the Giants victory, but I just want to tell you that last night's game was the second most watched event in TV history. Oh! the Mash finale is still champion.

One other note: In the last three games Eli and the Giants have beaten Tony Romo, Bret Favre and Tom Brady not a bad trifecta in anyone's book. If you're going to win you might as well beat the best.

The Giants recreate the 1969 Super Bowl upset

Posted earlier today: When thinking about tonight's Super Bowl XLII game, remember Jan. 12, 1969 when in Super Bowl III the New York Jets defeated the heavily favored Baltimore Colts 16-7. And when the upstart quarterback Joe Namath outplayed the great Johnny Unitas. So remember IT CAN BE DONE.

photo by Mike Blake, Reuters


Giants 17, Patriots 14

I told you it could be done

Now Eli Manning and this year's Giants go down in New York sports legend. This is an even bigger upset than the 1969 Jets and Namath.

Ralph DiGia: 1914-2008

Ralph DiGia

December 13, 1914 - February 1, 2008

Ralph DiGia, lifelong war resister and pacifist died this afternoon in New York City. Ralph had a bad fall a couple of weeks ago, broke his hip, and has had a series of serious health problems following his admission to St. Vincent's Hospital.

Ralph, 93, has been the heart and soul of War Resisters League since he came on staff shortly after the end of WWII and his release from federal prison, where he had served a term for refusing service as a conscientious objector.

An associate of A. J. Muste, Bayard Rustin, Dave Dellinger, Barbara Deming, and many others, Ralph held key posts over the years with Liberation magazine as well as being on the staffof the War Resisters League. While Ralph was not a public speaker or a writer, he played a key a role within the radical pacifist movement, and was central to many of the major antiwar actions of the past six decades.

Ralph was deeply loved by the movement, especially by those at his political home, the War Resisters League. He is survived by his wife, Karin DiGia, his children, and his two brothers.

Funeral and memorial arrangements are forthcoming.

Celebrate the life of Al Hakim, Dr. George Habash

Please join the Palestinian & Arab Community

Sunday Feb 3rd, 2:00 p.m.

at Widdi Catering Hall
to Commemorate and honor the life and work of
Al Hakim, Dr. George Habash.

Habash, who passed away on a week ago founded the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP),



Widdi Catering Hall
5602 6th Ave (Corner of 56th & 6th Ave)
Sunset Park, Brooklyn, NY
Subway - N/R to 59th Street

Five Years Too Many: anti-war actions

I just received this e-mail from NYC-United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ)

Dear Friends,

In conjunction with the national call for activities to mark the 5th anniversary of the war, NYC-UFPJ is planning a week of activity beginning with Winter Soldier events March 13-16 and culminating with RIVER TO RIVER: STAND UP FOR PEACE on Saturday, March 22.

On Saturday, March 22, we are calling New Yorkers to join us to form a human chain along 14th Street from Avenue A to 11th Avenue. We will gather all along 14th Street at noon and STAND UP FOR PEACE until 1:00 p.m. Then both ends will march towards each other to converge in Union Square for a short rally (permit pending).

Bring your friends, your children, your neighbors, your signs and banners.

The occupation of Iraq has taken an enormous toll on US servicepeople and their families and on the Iraqi people. And as we all know, it has also taken a huge toll on our communities. Imagine what the $490 billion already spent ($16 billion of that from New York City alone) could buy in affordable housing, services for seniors and people with HIV, resources for our schools, college scholarships and job training programs! We want to highlight these local costs of war with our signs and our leaflets to urge New Yorkers to take an active stand against this war!

In the next couple of weeks, there will be fliers to download and stickers that can be picked up at the UFPJ office so that we can all work together to spread the word!

On Wed. March 19, we are also calling for actions in neighborhoods and congressional districts all over the city. This is a time for all of us to become organizers, to reach out to those people who we know are against the war, but who have not yet joined us on the street. Gather together 10 or 20 of your neighbors for a candlelight vigil, a street phone-a-thon to Congress, a meeting with your congressperson or a roving sidewalk funeral procession. The Granny Peace Brigade will be at the Times Square Recruiting Station knitting sock coverings for veterans who have lost limbs. Westside Peace Action will join with others in a walk from W. 86th St to Columbus Circle. Add your event to the growing list of actions around the country! Be sure to post your event at www.5yearstoomany.org so that others can join you and we can help to publicize it!

5 years of death and destruction cannot continue! Let's join together to bring it to an end!

Peace,
Leslie Kielson
NYC-UFPJ Coordinator

By By Rudy

Well! All New Yorkers, as clearly many other Americans, wish Rudy well as he resumes his regular job as America's mayor.

The most interesting thing about the Guiliani campaign, I heard last night on MSNBC, is that wherever he actually appeared his poll numbers went down. In other words, it took most Americans alot less time to catch on to him than it took sophisticated New Yorkers.

SAG Award winners

Ruby Dee Accepts Award
The 2008 Screen Actors Guild (SAG) winners
(The SAG Awards were presented on Sunday, Jan 27, 2008)

(Winners are highlighted in bold)







MOTION PICTURES:

Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture:

3:10 TO YUMA
AMERICAN GANGSTER
HAIRSPRAY
INTO THE WILD
NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN

Male Actor in a Leading Role:

GEORGE CLOONEY / as Michael Clayton – “Michael Clayton”
DANIEL DAY-LEWIS / as Daniel Plainview – “There Will Be Blood”
RYAN GOSLING / as Lars Lindstrom – “Lars And The Real Girl”
EMILE HIRSCH / as Christopher McCandless – “Into The Wild”
VIGGO MORTENSEN / as Nikolai – “Eastern Promises”

Female Actor in a Leading Role:

CATE BLANCHETT / as Queen Elizabeth I – “Elizabeth: The Golden Age”
JULIE CHRISTIE / as Fiona – “Away From Her”
MARION COTILLARD / as Edith Piaf – “La Vie En Rose”
ANGELINA JOLIE / as Mariane Pearl – “A Mighty Heart”
ELLEN PAGE / as Juno MacGuff – “Juno”

Male Actor in a Supporting Role:

CASEY AFFLECK / as Robert Ford – “The Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford”
JAVIER BARDEM / as Anton Chigurh – “No Country For Old Men”
HAL HOLBROOK / as Ron Franz – “Into The Wild”
TOMMY LEE JONES / as Ed Tom Bell – “No Country For Old Men”
TOM WILKINSON / as Arthur Edens – “Michael Clayton”

Female Actor in a Supporting Role:

CATE BLANCHETT / as Jude – “I’m Not There”
RUBY DEE / as Mama Lucas – “American Gangster”
CATHERINE KEENER / as Jan Burres – “Into The Wild”
AMY RYAN / ass Helene McCready – “Gone Baby Gone”
TILDA SWINTON / as Karen Crowder – “Michael Clayton”


TELEVISION:

Ensemble in a Drama Series:

BOSTON LEGAL
THE CLOSER
GREY’S ANATOMY
MAD MEN
THE SOPRANOS


Male Actor in a Drama Series:

JAMES GANDOLFINI / as Tony Soprano – “The Sopranos”
MICHAEL C. HALL / as Dexter Morgan – “Dexter”
JON HAMM / as Don Draper – “Mad Men”
HUGH LAURIE / as Dr. Gregory House – “House”
JAMES SPADER / as Alan Shore – “Boston Legal”

Female Actor in a Drama Series:

GLENN CLOSE / as Patty Hewes – “Damages”
EDIE FALCO / as Carmela Soprano – “The Sopranos”
SALLY FIELD / as Nora Walker – “Brothers & Sisters”
HOLLY HUNTER / as Grace Hanadarko – “Saving Grace”
KYRA SEDGWICK / as Deputy Police Chief Brenda Johnson – “The Closer”

Ensemble in a Comedy Series:

30 ROCK
DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES
ENTOURAGE
THE OFFICE UGLY BETTY


Male Actor in a Comedy Series:

ALEC BALDWIN / as Jack Donaghy – “30 Rock”
STEVE CARELL / as Michael Scott – “The Office”
RICKY GERVAIS / as Andy Millman – “Extras”
JEREMY PIVEN / as Ari Gold – “Entourage”
TONY SHALHOUB / as Adrian Monk – “Monk”

Female Actor in a Comedy Series:

CHRISTINA APPLEGATE / as Samantha Newly – “Samantha Who?”
AMERICA FERRERA / as Betty Suarez – “Ugly Betty”
TINA FEY / as Liz Lemon – “30 Rock”
MARY-LOUISE PARKER / as Nancy Botwin – “Weeds”
VANESSA WILLIAMS / as Wilhelmina Slater – “Ugly Betty”


Male Actor in a Television Movie or Miniseries:

MICHAEL KEATON / as James Jesus Angleton – “The Company
KEVIN KLINE / as Jacques – “As You Like It”
OLIVER PLATT / as George Steinbrenner – “The Bronx is Burning”
SAM SHEPARD / as Frank Whiteley – “Ruffian”
JOHN TURTURRO / Billy Martin – “The Bronx is Burning”

Female Actor in a Television Movie or Miniseries:

ELLEN BURSTYN / as Posey Benetto – “Mitch Albom’s For One More Day”
DEBRA MESSING / as Molly Kagan – “The Starter Wife”
ANNA PAQUIN / as Elaine Goodale – “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee”
QUEEN LATIFAH / as Ana – “Life Support“
VANESSA REDGRAVE / as Woman – “The Fever”
GENA ROWLANDS / as Melissa Eisenbloom – “What If God Were the Sun?"

Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture:

300
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM
I AM LEGEND
THE KINGDOM
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT WORLD’S END

Stunt Ensemble in a Television Series:

24
HEROES
LOST
ROME
THE UNIT

Life Achievement Award: Charles Durning.

Wolfowitz: A bad penny keeps turning up

Here's an e-mail I just got from Andrew:


Paul Wolfowitz is back in the government?!?!?!?!?!?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/24/politics/main3750568.shtml
In arms control? GAH, is there a worse spot for one of the most evil men in the world? With his finger on the button?

peace and love
andy

February 8,: BOOK PARTY / FORUM: Urbane Revolutionary: C.L.R. James & the Struggle for a New Society

Friday, February 8, 7:30 pm

BOOK PARTY / FORUM

Urbane Revolutionary:
C.L.R. James & the Struggle for a New Society

Frank Rosengarten

The Brecht Forum
451 West Street
Directions

In his presentation of his new book, Urbane Revolutionary: C.L.R. James and the Struggle for a New Society, Frank Rosengarten will look at six controversial questions in James's life and work.

Feb. 7: F ilm: NO! The Rape Documentary

Thursday, February 7, 7:30 pm

FILM & DISCUSSION:

NO!
The Rape Documentary

Discussion with Filmmaker Aishah Shahidah Simmons

The Brecht Forum
451 West Street
Directions

Sliding scale $6/$10/$15
Free for Brecht Forum Subscribers

This feature length documentary explores the international reality of rape and other forms of sexual assault through the through intimate first person testimonies from Black women victim-survivors, commentaries from acclaimed African-American scholars and community leaders, archival footage, spirited music, transformational dance, and performance poetry.

Produced and directed by incest and rape survivor Aishah Shahidah Simmons over a period of 11 years, seven of which were full time, NO! is a Black feminist educational organizing tool, which is being used in the global movement to end violence against women and children. Winner of an audience choice award and a juried award at the San Diego Women Film Festival, NO! also explores how rape is used as a weapon of homophobia.


(Aishah Shahidah Simmons is an award-winning African-American feminist lesbian independent documentary filmmaker, television and radio producer, published writer, international lecturer, and activist based in Philadelphia, PA.)

Class: Red Threads in the 20th Century

Tuesday, February 05, 7:30 pm

Red Threads in the 20th Century
Mapping the Organized Left & Its Political Impact in the U.S.

6-Session class begins

The Brecht Forum
451 West Street
Directions

The social rupture of 1968 grew out of—and, at the same time, subverted—the legacy of earlier left political movements. After more than a decade of suppression, the U.S. left reemerged in both new and old forms. Their influence on 20th century social movements–and society as a whole--was much greater than their membership numbers or bases of sympathizers.

This series of discussions will explore the thinking and experiences of some of the main revolutionary and left-reformist parties and trends, from the decades pre-World War I to post-Soviet.

Ethan Young is a writer/editor with a sordid background of radical activism beginning in high school in the 60s. He has since moved to the left.

Feb. 1: Discussion: Columbia, Harlem & the World

Friday, February 01, 7:30 pm

1968 REVISITED
Columbia University, Harlem & the World

Kazembe Balagun, Thulani Davis, Bryan Mercer, Mark Rudd & Others TBA

The Brecht Forum
451 West Street
Directions
Sliding scale: $6/$10/$15
Free for Brecht Forum Subscribers

During the world-wide revolutionary upsurges of 1968, Columbia University was the site of a series of important and interconnected struggles. As the protest movements against the seemingly endless war in Vietnam continued to escalate in size and militancy, Columbia students and community members were simultaneously organizing against the Universities plans to expand into Harlem, displacing thousands of mostly black residents. These campaigns, targeting both the war at home and abroad, led to several interesting alliances and coalitions both on and off campus.

[Having been at Columbia in 1968, I have always believed that if it hadn't been for the coalition between Black and white students at Columbia College the university would have acted quite differently - the police would have been called in much sooner and the rebellion would not have had the chance to build on campus.- Dan]

40 years later the world has changed dramatically, yet we still find ourselves fighting many of these same struggles. Another endless war, a new series of proposed expansions by Columbia, a new generation of activists and organizers who are pushing back on neo-liberalism and empire.

An intergenerational dialogue between former and current student organizers who, drawing on a rich history and the current political context, discuss strategies for moving forward.

Jan. 31: Film Showing: FATIMA

Thursday, January 31, 7:30 pm

Fatima

NEW YORK PREMIERE SCREENING

The Brecht Forum
451 West Street
Directions

Discussion with Writer-Director Ricardo Lobo
(87 min | Arabic with English Subtitles)

Sliding scale:: $6/$10/$15
Free for Brecht Forum Subscribers

Fatima is a unique dramatic film shot in Baghdad amidst the war, featuring an all-Iraqi cast with a Palestinian lead actress. A beautiful young woman returns to Baghdad from abroad after the fall of Saddam Hussein to confront a harsh reality and shattered dreams.

Fatima is a psychological film that tackles the devastating effects of war on civilians, families and women. Shot on location, the film captures the raw reality and strong emotions that unfold in situations where violence prevails and the social and moral fabric deteriorates.

Set against this gloomy background, Fatima is a life-affirming film that highlights the importance of maintaining ethical standards in chaos. It is a film about love, choice and fate.

Ricardo Lobo is an independent filmmaker who has made over 30 films worldwide.
His website is lobodocs.comrecht

Quote of the day

It is hardly surprising that in a period when the greatest weapon of the right wing is fear of "A conspiracy so immense " Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy would again become its hero. It seems that a right-wing "journalist" has published a book (Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies) that is according to David Oshinsky, "a full-throated defense of the senator." Oshinsky himself has a dog in this fight as the author of the best critique of the senator, A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joe McCarthy. What's at stake in this rather esoteric attempted rehabilitation of the hated senator, is that maybe even Cheney, Bush and Rove and their groupies can be similarly rehabilitated. But in this case this is a long-winded intro to the quote of the day from Oshinsky's piece in the New York Times Book Review:

To be labeled a McCarthyite is akin to being called a liar or a fraud. His loudest current admirer is Ann Coulter, a fact I suspect, that even the senator would have found unsettling.

.

Contact Rep. Nadler re impeachment

I have both signed a letter and sent the following e-mail to Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who seems to be standing in the way of initiating impeachment proceedings against the current occupants of the White House,

Regarding: impeachment

Hi,
I understand you are blocking serious Congressional consideration of impeachment. It seems to me that the only way we (the U.S.) can regain the world's respect is to place the current occupant of the White House and his assistant devil for high crimes and misdemeanor- ors. What is more impeachable than lying to the American people in order to engage in an immoral and illegal war. This president (and his cohorts) in the Middle East is clearly like a bull in a China shop. Invading a sovereign country to get control of its resources and for domestic political purposes seems to me like what the founding fathers were talking about. It is your constitutional responsibility to at least seriously pursue the question.

It would be a good thing if you sign the letter as well.

And the nominees are...

Ellen Page in Juno

And the nominees are...


Best Picture

"Atonement"
"Juno"
"Michael Clayton"
"No Country For Old Men"
"There Will Be Blood"

Best Actress

Cate Blanchett, "Elizabeth: The Golden Age"
Julie Christie, "Away from Her"
Marion Cotillard, "La Vie en Rose"
Laura Linney, "The Savages"
Ellen Page, "Juno"

Best Actor

George Clooney, "Michael Clayton"
Daniel Day-Lewis, "There Will Be Blood"
Johnny Depp, "Sweeney Todd"
Tommy Lee Jones, "In the Valley of Elah"
Viggo Mortensen, "Eastern Promises"

Best Supporting Actress

Cate Blanchett, "I'm Not There"
Ruby Dee, "American Gangster"
Saorise Ronan, "Atonement"
Amy Ryan, "Gone Baby Gone"
Tilda Swinton, "Michael Clayton

Best Supporting Actor

Casey Affleck, "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford"
Javier Bardem, "No Country for Old Men"
Philip Seymour Hoffman, "Charlie Wilson's War"
Hal Holbrook, "Into the Wild"
Tom Wilkinson, "Michael Clayton"

Best Director

Paul Thomas Anderson, "There Will Be Blood"
Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, "No Country for Old Men"
Tony Gilroy, "Michael Clayton"
Jason Reitman, "Juno"
Julian Schnabel, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly"

Best Original Screenplay

Brad Bird, Jan Pinkava, Jim Capobianco, "Ratatouille"
Diablo Cody, "Juno"
Tony Gilroy, "Michael Clayton"
Tamara Jenkins, "The Savages"
Nancy Oliver, "Lars and the Real Girl"

Best Adapted Screenplay

Paul Thomas Anderson, "There Will Be Blood"
Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, "No Country for Old Men"
Christopher Hampton, "Atonement"
Ronald Harwood, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly"
Sarah Polley, "Away from Her"

Best Foreign Language Film

"Beaufort"
The Counterfeiters"
"Katyn"
"Mongol"
"12"

Best Animated Feature

"Perseopolis"
"Ratatouille"
"Surf's Up"

Best Documentary Feature

"No End in Sight"
"Operation Homecoming: Writing the Wartime Experience"
"Sicko"
"Taxi to the Dark Side"
"War/Dance"

Best Cinematography

Roger Deakins, "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford"
Roger Deakins, "No Country for Old Men"
Robert Elswit, "There Will Be Blood"
Janusz Kaminski, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly"
Seamus McGarvey, "Atonement"

Best Editing

Jay Cassidy, "Into the Wild"
Roderick Jaynes, "No Country for Old Men"
Christopher Rouse, "The Bourne Ultimatum"
Dylan Tichenor, "There Will Be Blood"
Juliette Welfling, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly"

Best Art Direction

"American Gangster"
"Atonement"
"The Golden Compass"
"Sweeney Todd"
"There Will Be Blood"

Best Original Score

Marco Beltrami, "3:10 to Yuma"
Michael Giacchino, "Ratatouille"
James Newton Howard, "Michael Clayton"
Alberto Iglesias, "The Kite Runner"
Dario Marianelli, "Atonement"

Best Original Song

"Falling Slowly," from "Once"
"Happy Working Song," from "Enchanted"
"Raise It Up," from "August Rush"
"So Close," from "Enchanted"
"That's How You Know," from "Enchanted"

Best Costume Design

"Across the Universe"
"Atonement"
"Elizabeth: The Golden Age"
"La Vie en Rose"
"Sweeney Todd"

Best Makeup

"La Vie en Rose"
"Norbit"
"Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End"

Best Sound Editing

"The Bourne Ultimatum"
"No Country for Old Men"
"Ratatouille"
"There Will Be Blood"
"Transformers"

Best Sound Mixing

"The Bourne Ultimatum"
"No Country for Old Men"
"Ratatouille"
"3:10 to Yuma"
"Transformers"

Best Visual Effects

"The Golden Compass"
"Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End"
"Transformers"

Best Live-Action Short Film

"At Night"
"Il Supplente (The Substitute)"
"Le Mozart des Pickpockets (The Mozart of Pickpockets)"
"Tanghi Argentini"
"The Tonto Woman"

Best Animated Short Film

"I Met the Walrus"
"Madame Tutli-Putli"
"Meme Les Pigeons Vont au Paradis (Even Pigeons Go to Heaven)"
"My Love (Moya Lyubov)"
"Peter & the Wolf"

Best Documentary Short Subject

"Freeheld"
"La Corona (The Crown)"
"Salim Baba"
"Sari's Mother"

Roe v. Wade at 35: Biology is no longer destiny

On this 35 anniversary of Roe v. Wade it behooves us to recognize why the right to choose, the right to control one's own body was (and still is) so important and must be defended. It has cynically been used by right-wing demagogues to organize support for their agenda. It is an inherently anti-liberation agenda.

The religious right, which is at the core of the anti-choice movement, is at the same time it opposes a woman's right to control her own body also opposed to many of the basic ways we might actually reduce abortions.

The most important argument for choice was made 29 years ago by the late Ellen Willis in the Village Voice (March and April 1979). In this article Willis wrote

the only way to drastically reduce the number of abortions is to invent safer, more reliable contraceptives, ensure universal access to all birth control methods, eliminate sexual ignorance and guilt, and change the social and economic conditions that make motherhood a trap.

Those who oppose choice also oppose most, if not all, of these innovations. Don't ever forget the Catholic Church which has been in the forefront of this movement is also against gender equality, contraception and sympathetic sex education. Essentially the anti-choice movement is also an anti-female sexuality movement. Most people who are opposed to choice believe that the only way women can avoid the possibility of unwanted pregnancy is abstention. In other words, sex is OK for men, but not for women. That's biology, sorry.

Willis again:

When all the cant about "responsibility" is stripped away, what the right-to-life position comes down to is, if the effect of prohibiting abortion is to keep women slaves to their biology, so be it.

It should be obvious to even the most neanderthal-like anti-choice proponents that gender equality is impossible without a woman's right to control her own body.

There is one other thing that needs to be said. After the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, too many of us sat back and assumed that it was set in concrete forever. Unfortunately the right-wing opponents of choice did not sit back, they fought back. And after almost eight years of extreme right wing power, it looks like the battle has to be fought again. Lets make today, the 35th anniversary of Roe, a clarion moment in the battle for women's rights.

Razzie noms announced on eve of Oscar noms

On the eve of the Oscar nominations announcement (actually later this morning), the Razzies (years worst) noms are out. The winners (losers) will be announced Feb. 23 on the eve of the Oscars.






Worst Picture
Bratz
Daddy Day Camp
I Know Who Killed Me
I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry
Norbit

Worst Actor
Nicholas Cage -- Ghost Rider, National Treasure: Book of Secrets, and Next
Jim Carrey -- The Number 23
Cuba Gooding, Jr. -- Daddy Day Camp and Norbit
Eddie Murphy (as Norbit) -- Norbit
Adam Sandler -- I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry

Worst Actress
Jessica Alba -- Awake, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and Good Luck Chuck
Logan Browning, Janel Parrish, Nathalia Ramos, and Skyler Shaye -- Bratz
Elisha Cuthbert -- Captivity
Diane Keaton -- Because I Said So
Lindsay Lohan (as Aubrey) -- I Know Who Killed Me
Lindsay Lohan (as Dakota) -- I Know Who Killed Me

Worst Supporting Actor
Orlando Bloom -- Pirates of the Carob-bean: At Wit's End -- aka Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
Kevin James -- I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry
Eddie Murphy (as Mr. Wong) -- Norbit
Rob Schneider -- I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry
Jon Voight -- Bratz, National Treasure: Book of Secrets, September Dawn, and Transformers

Worst Supporting Actress
Jessica Biel -- I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry and Next
Carmen Electra -- Epic Movie
Eddie Murphy (as Rasputia) -- Norbit
Julia Ormond -- I Know Who Killed Me
Nicolette Sheridan -- Code Name: The Cleaner

Worst Screen Couple
Jessica Alba & Either: Hayden Christiansen (Awake), Dane Cook (Good Luck Chuck), or Ioan Gruffudd (Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer)
Any Combination of Two Totally Air-Headed Characters -- Bratz
Lindsay Lohan & Lindsay Lohan -- I Know Who Killed Me
Eddie Murphy (as Norbit) & Either: Eddie Murphy (as Mr. Wong) or Eddie Murphy (as Rasputia) -- Norbit
Adam Sandler & Either: Kevin James or Jessica Biel -- I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry

Worst Remake or Rip-Off
Are We Done Yet? -- Remake/Rip-Off of Mr. Blandings Builds his Dream House
Bratz -- "A rip-off if ever there was one!"
Epic Movie -- "Of every movie it rips off."
I Know Who Killed Me -- Rip-Off of Hostel, Saw, and The Patty Duke Show
Who's Your Caddy -- Rip-Off of Caddyshack

Worst Prequel or Sequel
Alien vs. Predator: Requiem
Daddy Day Camp
Evan Almighty
Hannibal Rising
Hostel: Part II

Worst Director
Dennis Dugan -- I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry
Roland Joffe -- Captivity
Brian Robbins -- Norbit
Fred Savage -- Daddy Day Camp
Chris Siverston -- I Know Who Killed Me

Worst Screenplay
Daddy Day Camp -- Geoff Rodkey, David J. Stem, and David N. Weiss
Epic Movie -- Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer
I Know Who Killed Me -- Jeffrey Hammond
I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry -- Barry Fanaro, Alexander Payne, and Jim Taylor
Norbit -- Eddie Murphy, Charles Murphy, Jay Sherick, and David Ronn

Worst Excuse for a Horror Movie -- New Category
Alien vs. Predator: Requiem
Captivity
Hannibal Rising
Hostel: Part II
I Know Who Killed Me

The media and the "writers Strike"

There are many reasons for the anti-union perspective of the corporate-owned media in relation to the strike involving the film producers and TV networks (AMPTP) and the writers (WGA). The TV networks' news programs are obviously covering the same strike that directly effects their bosses in lother areas. And they have never been known for placing journalistic ethics above corporate profits.

But I think, the print media has its own issues with the strike, namely the Newspaper Guild. If they look too favorably on the movie and TV writers' action they may be faced with one of their own.

But let's be fair. In the excellent State of the Unions Philip M. Dine has argued that one of the problems that labor has is its difficulty with communication with the press. And it's clear that the networks and movie studios have much better public relations.

Two recent print pieces demonstrate this problem. They both heavily favor the producers and networks.

The New York Times article by Jacques Steinberg deals with how come the soaps can keep producing new shows and avoid reruns. The answer is, of course, quite simple. As in most strikes executives and other staff people are forced to pitch in. And there is a "guild designation known as "financial Core" or financial need," which allows Guild writers to go back to work. But it's odd that after an interview with someone who criticizes two All My Children writers who invoked the clause, we find out the two writers being criticized replaced the woman making the criticism when she was fired. Why bother to include such questionable material except to make the union look bad. But at least Steinberg eventually includes the pertinent information.

That's more than we can say for the New York Post's Adam Buckman's Sunday anti-union diatribe "TV writers have already lost the battle." Buckman's distortion of the strike reality is clearly evident in statements like:

Maybe the writers don't care what others think of them, but they have to be the least popular people in Hollywood right now. Among those who must be sick of them as the strike drags on into its third month: Hundreds of stranded non-writing co-workers...; and the public....

The striking writers didn't kill TV; they only succeeded in making a lot of people - those who watch TV and those who work in it - hate them.

According to Buckman's reporting this must be the first strikes in history with only one contending force. There is, of course, no mention of the fact that the AMPTP walked out of negotiations six weeks ago.

Buckman's column reads like a producer/networks' press release. Why is no counter information coming from the WGA.

The most serious violation of journalistic ethics is Buckman's failure to mention That the owners of the paper that publishes his column - the New York Post - also owns the Fox TV network against which the "hated" writers are on strike. Do I hear conflict of interest?

Go Giants

Eli Manning














Go Giants

Who would have believed that Eli would be the Manning brother to go to the Ssuper Bowl

Whatever happens Feb. 3 --- GO GIANTS --- they are giving us one more game (and what a game) to root for them.

My apologies to Eli for saying the Giants would never win a championship with him as quarterback. They did last night. And they're gonna win a bigger one Feb. 3. Remember! You heard it here first.

go Blue

The New York Times and Mr. Kristol

I certainly wouldn't hazard a guess as to why the powers that be at the New York Times chose this moment in U.S. history (on the cusp of the most important election in years) to hire an extreme right-wing ideolog to write a bi-weekly column. Well maybe I would but for the moment I would rather take them at their word.

Ernest Partridge quotes Op-Ed page Editor Andrew Rosenthal's explanation of why they hired William Kristol:

Mr. Kristol ... is a columnist and magazine editor, with views that clearly bother you. I disagree with many of his views, as well as many of the other views expressed on our Op-Ed page. It is not my job to print only those with whom I agree. It is my job to give readers [as] broad a spectrum of views to read as we can manage.

So Mr. Rosenthal opens up the question of how we can broaden the spectrum of views the New York Times can manage. Let's start a canpaign to persuade the paper of record to hire a columnist who would balance Kristol. Well perhaps there is no one not institutionalized who can actually balance Kristol but right off the top of my head I can suggest several very good journalists who would broaden the political spectrum of views available to Times readers (that would be "fit to print"). How about Democracy Now's Amy Goodman? Or perhaps Air America's Rachel Maddow (who often appears on Countdown with Keith Olbermann)? Other possibilities are Media Beat author Norman Solomon or independen journalist Greg Palast. I haven't spoken to any of these people and have no idea if they would even be interested in a Times' column. But they only scratch the surface of "broadening the Times spectrum of views" unless Mr. Rosenthal doesn't really mean it and "broadening the spectrum" is just an excuse to extend the Times spectrum as far to the right as is humanly possible.

But the problem with Kristol isn't that he is on the extreme right, but that he was one of the key neo-con artists who constructed the ideological justification for the Bush Doctrine. Now he is using the column to attack all critics of Bush foreign policy and justify the fantasies of the neo-con led Bush foreign policy. So what does Kristol actually say about our occupation of Iraq and his sworn enemy the Democratic Party.

Obama has been pretty consistent in his opposition to the war. But Bill Clinton is right [I can just feel the pain in Kristol's face as he wrote out those four words]...:Obama's view of the current situation in Iraq is out of touch with reality. In this, however, Obama is at one with Hillary Clinton and the entire leadership of the Democratic Party.

Would that that were true. If it was, I would register as a Democrat tommorow.

What is Kristol's version of reality with which Obama is "out of touch?" The Democrats refuse

to admit real success because that success has been achieved under the leadership of...George W. Bush.

But what is this success the Democrats won't admit?

The Democrats were wrong in their assessments of the surge. Attacks per week on American troops are now down about 60 percent from June. Civilian deaths are down approximately 75 percent from a year ago. December 2007 saw the second lowest number of U.S. troops killed in action since March 2003.

So we've gone from "Mission Accomplished" to measuring "real success" in Iraq in terms of less of our troops being killed.

Kristol has one more piece of evidence for Bush success:

...Now Iraq's Parliament has passed a de-Baathification law - one of the so-called benchmarks Congress established for political reconciliation. For much of 2007, Democrats were able to deprecate the military progress and political reconciliation taking place on the ground [less U.S. forces being killed] by harping on the failure of the Iraqui government to pass the benchmark legislation. They are being deprived of even that talking point.

Kristol's desperate rush to judgement of the Democrats is unfortunately undermined by the Times "harping on the failure of the Iraqi government to pass the benchmark legislation" in the very same issue in which Kristol's column appeared. Here's Solomon Moore's analysis:

...the legislation is at once confusing and controversial, a document riddled with loopholes and caveats to the point that some Sunni and Shiite officials say it could actually exclude more former Baaathists than it lets back in, particularly in the crucial security ministries.

I don't think this is actually what Congress had in mind. It's not that Kristol could have seen this article when he wrote his column, but it demonstrates his premature self-justification and rush to attack his enemies.

It would seem to me that New York Times' readers deserve better than William Kristol's self-serving screed, but, if Rosenthal really wants to broaden the spectrum of views available on the op-ed page, there are many excellent ant real journalists avilable.

The New York Times and the Hollywood work stopage

The media coverage of the struggle between the Hollywood producers and TV honchos (AMPTP) and the screen and TV writers (WGA) continues to raise serious questions about journalistic ethics. Most of the coverage, of course, deals with the lack of the usual elaborate TV coverage of the award shows. Take, for example, David Carr's ("The Carpetbagger") article in yesterday's New York Times. For example with regard to the likelihood of an Oscar show, he quotes one of his producer sources, Walter F. Parkes, as follows:

If there is a quick settlement with the directors' guild and if it is looked upon by the writer's guild as a framework for negotiations, and it brings them back to the table, there might be an Oscar telecast.

This is the last point made in the article. Carr never questions its accuracy despite the fact that the producers and network executives walked away from the table not the writers. But to acknowledge that would challenge the basic point of view of his article, which is that of the producers and network executives.

At an earlier point in the article Carr writes:

No one...last night... [after the Globes' non-show] wanted to be spotted jackknifing in glee with a Champagne glass in hand at a time when the town is tearing itself in half because of a writers' strike that has idled most television production, threatened future movie shoots, put thousands of people out of work....

So if you are interested in who is responsible for "the town...tearing itself in half" and "put thousands of people out of work" its obviously the writers, who are on strike.

This despite the fact as Michael Winship, president of the Writers guild, East, reminded us on Democracy Now that it was the

the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, against whom we’re still on strike...who have refused to come back to the bargaining table.

Unfortunately this view from the perspective of one side of this dispute is not unique to Carr and the Times. It has been characteristic of almost all the corporate-owned media. I'll bet that if asked when Carr was researching the article the president of the Writers Guild, west would have been happy to talk to him. But I guess Carr and his editors just weren't interested.

The other thought I had about all this is how we've reached the point where if TV doesn't cover these awards with all the stars and the red-carpet brouhaha they don't really happen. That may be the unkindest cut of all.

Jan 17: Brecht Forum: Beneath the Froth of the Democratic Race

Primary Colors

Thursday, January 17, 7:00 pm

THIRD THURSDAYS

Beneath the Froth of the Democratic Race

Kat Aaron, Jean Carey Bond, Laura Flanders & Others TBA

The BRECHT FORUM
451 West Street (Between Bank & Bethune)

(212) 242- 4201

Hillary can only win if she cries. Barack can only talk race if he doesn’t mention it by name. “Change” is the watchword of the day but no one can say what they’ll do that’s different. So how do those on the left relate to the carnival of the Democratic presidential primaries? Is it all just bread and circuses to sell more newspapers and distract from the real issues at hand? Or are there hidden meanings on the campaign trail that we need to unpack and debate? In the first of a new series of rapid response discussions, where the best critical commentators in town take on a hot button issue of the day, the Brecht Forum’s Third Thursday looks at Iowa, New Hampshire and beyond to ask “What’s any of this got to do with us?” Come along and join the conversation.Starting in 2008, join us on the Third Thursday of each month to dig beneath the headlines and late breaking news. We'll have analysts on hand to help guide a lively discussion. Check back for updates on topics and speakers.

Sliding scale: $6/$10/$15
Free for Brecht Forum Subscribers

Golden Globes

So, strike or no strike, it's begun. Actually I like it better this way, without all the brouhaha - just a simple announcement. Who won. The award season has begun. A neat break from the incessant presidential primaries.

Last night, the Golden Globes. For better or worse. TV and films. Drama and music and comedy. So here they are. I'll reserve comment until we get closer to the Oscars.

Film:

Best Picture Drama: Atonement
Best Picture Musical/Comedy: Sweeny Todd

Best Actress Drama: Julie Christie (Away From Her)
Best Actress Musical/Comedy: Marion Cotillard (La Vie en Rose)

Best actor Drama: Daniel Day Lewis (There Will Be Blood)
Best actor Musical/Comedy: Johnny Depp (Sweeny Todd)

Best Supporting Actress: Cate Blanchett (I'm Not There)
Best Supporting Actor: Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men)

Best Foreign Language Film: The Diving Bell and the Butterfly

Best Animated Feature Film: Ratatouille

Best Director: Julian Schnable (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly)
Best Screenplay: Joel Coen & Ethan Coen (No Country for Old Men)

Best original score: Atonement
Best original song: "Guaranteed" (Into the Wild)

TV:

Best Drama: Mad Men
Best Musical/Comedy: Extras
Best Mini-Series: Longford

Best Actress Drama: Glenn Close (Damages)
Best Actress Musical/Comedy: Tina Fay (30 Rock)


Best Actor Drama: Jon Hamm (Mad Men)
Best Actor Musical/Comedy: David Duchovny (Californication)

Best Actress in a Mini-series or Motion Picture: Queen Latifa (Life Support)
Best Actor in a Mini-series or Motion Picture: Jim Brodbent (Longford)

Best Supporting Actress: Samantha Morton (Longford)
Best Supporting Actor: Jeremy Piven (Entourage)

Jan 18: Film: "AMANDLA: A Revolution in Four-Part Harmony"

"AMANDLA: A Revolution in Four-Part Harmony"

Friday, Jan. 18, 7pm
2295 Adam Clayton Powell Jr. Blvd. (at 135th St.)
2/3 or C/B to 135th street
$7 donation suggested

Amandla! (2002) is one of the first documentaries about the fight against apartheid in South Africa. More importantly, it tells the story in a way that is inspirational, funny, factual and humanizes the struggle.
The film was the most decorated film at Sundance 2002, where it won the Audience Award for Documentaries and the Freedom of Expression Award.

Get involved! Contact 212-694-8720 or nyc@ANSWERCoalition.org

Media bias in writers-producers battle

The way in which the media has been covering the struggle between the Writers Guild (WGA) and the movie and TV producers (AMPTP) is very revealing of the biases of the corporate-owned media, particularly the way in which they have covered the threat posed to the award shows. For example, Variety's most recent headline:
"Globes is latest victim of WGA Strike; Ceremony collapses under weight of walkout."

Why "victim of WGA Strike?" Why not "victim of greedy, stonewalling producers?"

First of all it was the AMPTP that walked out of the negotiations on Dec. 7. So if anyone is responsible for the current problems, it is the producers not the writers.

But even at a more basic level no labor-management struggle is ever the result of the actions of only one side. No labor union has ever gone on strike unless provoked by management. The process is very simple: the current contract expires, the union makes a proposal, management accepts it or rejects it or they negotiate. In this case the WGA put a proposal on the table, the producers, instead of negotiating, walked out because they misjudged the union's strength and commitment. So we are at a standstill in negotiations - nothing is happening and the award shows (and the TV series) are falling like dominos. All it would take to get things moving again would be for the producers and networks to get back to the bargaining table. But you would never get this from the fundamentally dishonest media coverage.

Or try this Variety headline: "WGA strike means pay cuts at ICM." So anyone at ICM, whose pay is cut (or job is eliminated) knows who to blame. Why not?: "Stonewalling producers mean pay cuts at ICM"

For a breath of fresh air on the strike coverage check out Roger Wolfson on the Huffington Post and Michael Winship, President of the WGA-East on Friday's Democracy Now

Writers Guild nominates years best

As the film award season hits high gear here's my attempt to keep track of what's happening. This is an attempt to compensate for the absence of award shows on TV due to the producers and network excutives stonewalling the writers.
Here are the writers' nominees for year's best. Winners will be announced Feb. 9 in L.A. and New York.
But according to Variety the "WGA has called off the Feb. 9 awards show in Los Angeles — unless it has ended its strike by then." "the guild said it would announce its awards as planned but added, 'There will be no Writers Guild of America West show until the strike is over.'”



Original Screenplay:
Juno, Diablo Cody
Michael Clayton, Tony Gilroy
The Savages, Tamara Jenkins
Knocked Up, Judd Apatow
Lars and the Real Girl, Nancy Oliver

Adapted Screenplay:
No Country for Old Men, Ethan Coen & Joel Coen, based on the novel by Cormac McCarthy.
There Will Be Blood, Paul Thomas Anderson, based on the novel Oil by Upton Sinclair
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Ronald Harwood, based on the memoir by Jean-Dominique Bauby.
Into the Wild, Sean Penn, based on the book by Jon Krakauer.
Zodiac, James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith.

Michael Moore's Sicko is among the nomines for Best Documentary Screenplay.

Also nominated were
Anthony Giacchino for The Camden 28,
Bill Guttentag, Dan Sturman and Elisabeth Bentley for Nanking,
Charles Ferguson for No End in Sight,
Richard Berge, Nicole Newnham and Bonni Cohen for The Rape of Europa, and
Alex Gibney for Taxi to the Dark Side.

Rudy feeds on tit of disaster

Today Rudy Guiliani's (who thinks he's already been elected president) announced the creation of a disaster and terrorism advisory committee:

The Rudy Giuliani Presidential Committee today announced the Catastrophe Advisory Committee. This group will advise Mayor Giuliani on the needs of local communities in preparing for and responding to hurricanes and other natural disasters, in addition to the creation of a National Catastrophic Fund.

Joe M. Allbaugh, former Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, will serve as the National Chair of the committee.

It seems clear that Guiliani believes in the twin pillars of the Cheney-Bush administration: fear and enriching one's friends. Scare them to death so that they won't notice you're feeding at the public trough. Perhaps you don't remember the name Joe Allbaugh. Here's Sam Stein on The Huffington Post:

to the disastrous reign of Michael Brown. In fact, he was the man who made Brown the Number 2 official at the agency. During Katrina, as the country suffered through the most botched disaster response in its history, Allbaugh was on the ground in the Gulf region -- not to help in reconstruction, but to get lucrative business contracts for corporate clients. His companies included Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR), the subsidiary of Halliburton; TruePosition, a manufacturer of wireless products, services and devices, and the Shaw Group, a provider of engineering, design and construction services. Another Allbaugh client, Service Corporation International received a mega-contract through FEMA (through a subsidiary) to help with the recovery and relocation of Katrina victims.

And this is the same Rudy Guiliani who claims Bernie Kerik was an aberration in his appointment history.

One might have assumed that a presidential contender might want to run on the promise of hope and change but it seems that for some reason the right-wing Republican candidates want to wallow in the mire of the Cheney-Bush years.

Jan 8: Palestine slide show

Our good friend and comrade Ellen Davidson (with whom I used to work at The Guardian) sent us the following announcement. I strongly urge you to pay attention to anything with which she and Judith Pasternak are involved.

Jan. 8
Last chance in Manhattan to see Palestine slide show

Yes, next week is the last time we'll be presenting our show Pictures of
Palestine in Manhattan
(although it looks like we'll be taking it on the
road to Brooklyn soon).

Tuesday, Jan. 8, 7:00 p.m.
At the home of Mariliyn Clement
4 West 13th Street, Apt. 2RW

Judith Pasternak and I [Ellen] will do a reportback from our trip to Palestine last
summer, with stories and pictures of the destroyed Palestinian village of
Lifta, the Israeli settler community in Hebron, Syrian Druse resistance to
Israeli occupation, and much more.

If you've already seen the show, perhaps you'd like to recommend it to someone else.

Hope to see you there!

Ellen

Jan 11: Shut Down Guantanamo

From Witness Against Torture: A Campaign to Shut Down Guantanamo

Friday, January 11, 2008: The 6 year anniversary of the first prisoners being brought to Guantánamo.

Last year on January 11th, after 500 people proceeded from the Supreme Court to the Federal court, 150 people risked arrest on behalf of the men in Guantanamo, with 88 being arrested inside the Federal Court in DC. Many of those arrested withheld their identification and took the names of men at Guantanamo. It was a very powerful day, made possible by the contributions of many in the extended Catholic Worker family.

This year, we again are working with many groups on a demonstration in Washington, D.C. The day will begin with a rally at the National Mall co-sponsored with Amnesty International and the National Religious Campaign Against Torture followed by a “prisoner procession” to the Supreme Court. Endorsed by Bill of Rights Defense Committee, CodePink, International Federation for Human Rights, Network of Spiritual Progressives, Peace Action, School of the Americas Watch, Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition International, United for Peace and Justice, War Resisters League, and other groups.

Come to DC or if you're in New York City and can't make it to D.C. there's an alternative:

CLOSE GUANTANAMO Vigil
Jan 11 2008 - 12:30-2:00 pm

Foley Square
Pearl and Centre Sts.

Commemorate six years of boys and men being thrown into Guantánamo Prison

Say, “NO MORE!”:

• to Indefinite Detentions
• to Inhumane & Degrading Treatment
• to Lack of Fair Trials
• to Torture

led by Imam Talib Abdur Rashid — 12:30pm
Interfaith Prayers & Vigil — 1:00-2:00pm
Bring Signs, Slogans, Prayers and Hope

Metro New York Religious Campaign Against Torture
Contact: Father Mark Hallinan, S.J. at 917-853-7137, mchallinan@juno.com
http://www.nyrcat.org

For other actions around the U.S. and around the world see